PRISMÆON TECHNOLOGY

A governed path from a requested operation to an accepted result.

A governed path from a requested operation to an accepted result.

Prismæon separates proposal, authorization, execution, completion, validation, and acceptance. The current physical reference combines host software and FPGA logic to exercise that lifecycle for bounded data-movement operations on an AMD Kria KR260.

Prismæon separates proposal, authorization, execution, completion, validation, and acceptance. The current physical reference combines host software and FPGA logic to exercise that lifecycle for bounded data-movement operations on an AMD Kria KR260.

A request, a completion report, and an accepted result are different things.

A request, a completion report, and an accepted result are different things.

PROPOSAL

AUTHORIZATION

EXECUTION

COMPLETION + VALIDATION

ACCEPTANCE

THE COMPILER PROPOSES. NŒTIS GOVERNS.

THE COMPILER PROPOSES. NŒTIS GOVERNS.

In some systems, substantially the same software environment requests work, interprets completion, and records success. A fault or compromise can therefore affect both the operation and the records used to assess it. Prismæon makes the required conditions for acceptance explicit: authority, identity, live state, sequence, completion, validation, and required evidence must reconcile. A mismatch stops the transaction for inspection.

In some systems, substantially the same software environment requests work, interprets completion, and records success. A fault or compromise can therefore affect both the operation and the records used to assess it. Prismæon makes the required conditions for acceptance explicit: authority, identity, live state, sequence, completion, validation, and required evidence must reconcile. A mismatch stops the transaction for inspection.

CORE PRINCIPLES

Governed Execution

Required authority, device identity, and live state are checked within the governed operation path.

Heterogeneous by Design

The broader architecture targets heterogeneous computing. The demonstrated physical configuration is the KR260 FPGA reference.

Deterministic Evidence

Execution and resulting evidence are designed to remain inspectable and attributable.

Physical reference

The tested image is timing-closed, deployed, and identity-verified on physical KR260 hardware. Further integrations require additional engineering and validation.

DEVELOPMENT PATH

01 Architecture
COMPLETE

02 Deterministic Simulation
COMPLETE

03 RTL Implementation
COMPLETE

04 AMD Kria KR260 deployment — DEPLOYED AND IDENTITY-VERIFIED

05 Sustained operation and verified I/O — DEMONSTRATED WITHIN TEST BOUNDARIES

06 Comparative testing and evaluation platform — IN DEVELOPMENT

07 Production hardware and specialized silicon — FUTURE, EVIDENCE-GATED

Evidence discipline

Evidence discipline

The O6 campaign recorded 22,071 accepted measured operations over approximately 30 minutes. O7-A demonstrated 100 accepted operations, 100 validated destinations, and 200 verified writes. Preserved evidence supports those bounded results. Performance parity, acceleration, power advantage, production readiness, and lifetime reliability remain unestablished.

The O6 campaign recorded 22,071 accepted measured operations over approximately 30 minutes. O7-A demonstrated 100 accepted operations, 100 validated destinations, and 200 verified writes. Preserved evidence supports those bounded results. Performance parity, acceleration, power advantage, production readiness, and lifetime reliability remain unestablished.

Why hardware participates

Why hardware participates

The FPGA reference lets the program test governed operation against a physical execution path, including device identity, live state, ordered completion, and observed I/O. Host software handles orchestration, validation, and evidence around that path. Matched measurements and the selected application must determine whether the value justifies the integration effort, resource use, and performance cost.

The FPGA reference lets the program test governed operation against a physical execution path, including device identity, live state, ordered completion, and observed I/O. Host software handles orchestration, validation, and evidence around that path. Matched measurements and the selected application must determine whether the value justifies the integration effort, resource use, and performance cost.

Have a technical question or a candidate workflow?

Have a technical question or a candidate workflow?

Technical reviewers · Prospective evaluation partners · Investors · Founding team

Prismaeon Inc. · Prismæon™

Governed execution. Verifiable outcomes. · nigel@prismaeon.com